A contrast in artistic styles.
Posted in arty ponderings on May 17th, 2010 by RicA contrast in artistic styles.
Art is so subjective. This is merely my opinion. On my recent trip to Amsterdam I was struck by the contrast between art styles, bouncing from old masters to 20th century artists. Anyone that knows me knows that I tend to favour Dutch masters in general and Rembrandt in particular. There is something about Rembrandt that gripped me from an early age, there is an atmosphere to his paintings, a particular way of using the light, a subtlety and yet such a close attention to detail. I had the pleasure of seeing his work at his house on Jodenbreestrat and at the Rijks Museum. Over the course of our four day visit we went round a number of museums and galleries including the Hermitage where the contrast between old and new was very striking. I delighted in the old masters and found myself scratching my head at the Picassos’. It is true to say that I am not fond of Picasso’s work but having seen his work in Barcelona last year I had thought I was warming to him, understanding what he had to say even if I didn’t like the art. Seeing his work after the old masters seemed to revive all the things I dislike about Cubism and some forms of modem art. There is a particular painting which is a black square, I stood and looked at it trying to desperately justify it as art in my mind. I know I risk the title of philistine, which might well be fair, but looking at the black square with a grubby white border the only think I can say is the paint was applied smoothly, though the white was grubby. Maybe it was supposed to be grubby, I don’t know.
On the up side Modern Art at its best is superb, ground breaking, inventive and a joy to see. And at its worst… well, it is always nice to see hung on a wall in a prestigious gallery a piece of art that frankly most present day artists would have put into the bin for recycling. It is subjective. This is merely my humble opinion but I think it gives hope to all aspiring artists.